Difference between revisions of "Relationship between Sievert integral and exponential integral E"
From specialfunctionswiki
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
− | {{BookReference|Handbook of mathematical functions|1964|Milton Abramowitz|author2=Irene A. Stegun|prev= | + | {{BookReference|Handbook of mathematical functions|1964|Milton Abramowitz|author2=Irene A. Stegun|prev=Asymptotic behavior of Sievert integral|next=Relationship between Sievert integral and Bessel K}}: $27.4.2$ |
[[Category:Theorem]] | [[Category:Theorem]] | ||
[[Category:Unproven]] | [[Category:Unproven]] |
Revision as of 02:07, 21 December 2016
Theorem
The following formula holds for $x \geq 0$ and $0 < \theta < \dfrac{\pi}{2}$: $$S(x,\theta)=\displaystyle\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} e^{-x\sec(\phi)} \mathrm{d}\phi - \displaystyle\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \alpha_k (\cos(\theta))^{2k+1} E_{2k+2} \left( \dfrac{x}{\cos(\theta)} \right),$$ where $S$ denotes the Sievert integral, $e^{*}$ denotes the exponential, $\sec$ denotes secant, $\alpha_k$ is defined by $\alpha_0 := 1$ and for $k=1,2,3,\ldots$, $\alpha_k := \dfrac{1 \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \cdot \ldots \cdot (2k+1)}{2 \cdot 4 \cdot 6 \cdot \ldots \cdot 2k}$, $\cos$ denotes cosine, and $E_{2k+2}$ denotes the exponential integral E.
Proof
References
1964: Milton Abramowitz and Irene A. Stegun: Handbook of mathematical functions ... (previous) ... (next): $27.4.2$