Difference between revisions of "Talk:Klein invariant J"
From specialfunctionswiki
Graveolens (talk | contribs) (Created page with "So, the Klein $j$-invariant pops up in a lot of places, and I'm reticent about saying "it has *this* definition in *this* way in *this* context", because like SL(2,Z) it's ver...") |
Graveolens (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
SL(2,Z) it's very, gooey (not easy to quantify that), and (going out on a limb), | SL(2,Z) it's very, gooey (not easy to quantify that), and (going out on a limb), | ||
I myself don't see the world as a panoply of elliptic curves. And where things | I myself don't see the world as a panoply of elliptic curves. And where things | ||
| − | like this shine, are when you can go from one of its contexts to another. | + | like this shine, are when you can go from one of its contexts to another. [[User:Graveolens|Graveolens]] ([[User talk:Graveolens|talk]]) 15:41, 9 October 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:41, 9 October 2014
So, the Klein $j$-invariant pops up in a lot of places, and I'm reticent about saying "it has *this* definition in *this* way in *this* context", because like SL(2,Z) it's very, gooey (not easy to quantify that), and (going out on a limb), I myself don't see the world as a panoply of elliptic curves. And where things like this shine, are when you can go from one of its contexts to another. Graveolens (talk) 15:41, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
