Difference between revisions of "Cosecant"
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
{{:Derivative of cosecant}} | {{:Derivative of cosecant}} | ||
{{:Relationship between csc, Gudermannian, and coth}} | {{:Relationship between csc, Gudermannian, and coth}} | ||
+ | {{:Relationship between coth, inverse Gudermannian, and csc}} | ||
<center>{{:Trigonometric functions footer}}</center> | <center>{{:Trigonometric functions footer}}</center> |
Revision as of 23:37, 25 August 2015
The cosecant function is defined by $$\csc(z)=\dfrac{1}{\sin(z)}.$$
- Cosecant.png
Graph of $\csc$ on $\mathbb{R}$.
- Complex Csc.jpg
Domain coloring of analytic continuation of $\csc$.
Contents
Properties
Theorem
The following formula holds: $$\dfrac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}z} \csc(z)=- \cot(z)\csc(z),$$ where $\csc$ denotes the cosecant function and $\cot$ denotes the cotangent function.
Proof
Using the quotient rule and the definitions of cosecant and cotangent, $$\begin{array}{ll} \dfrac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}z} \csc(z) &= \dfrac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}z} \left[ \dfrac{1}{\sin(z)} \right] \\ &= \dfrac{0-\cos(z)}{\sin^2(z)} \\ &= -\csc(z)\cot(z), \end{array}$$ as was to be shown. █
References
- 1964: Milton Abramowitz and Irene A. Stegun: Handbook of mathematical functions ... (previous) ... (next): $4.3.108$
Theorem
The following formula holds: $$\csc(\mathrm{gd}(x))=\mathrm{coth}(x),$$ where $\csc$ is the cosecant, $\mathrm{gd}$ is the Gudermannian, and $\mathrm{coth}$ is the hyperbolic cotangent.
Proof
References
Theorem
The following formula holds: $$\mathrm{coth}(\mathrm{gd}^{-1}(x))=\csc(x),$$ where $\mathrm{coth}$ is the hyperbolic cotangent, $\mathrm{gd}^{-1}$ is the inverse Gudermannian, and $\csc$ is the cosecant.